Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! Today, we’re expanding on the topic of legal remedies for breach of contract, which we started covering in Episode 354. This time we look at the rules governing incidental, reliance, and restitution damages and apply the law to two fact patterns.
In this episode we discuss:
- The rules governing:
- Incidental damages
- Reliance damages
- Restitution damages
- An analysis of two hypothetical scenario
Thanks for listening!
Listen Now
To listen now, just click on the arrow button above.
Resources:
- “Listen and Learn” series
- California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, July 2014
- Podcast Episode 354: Listen and Learn – Expectation and Consequential Damages (Contracts)
Prefer to read?
Did You Like It?
If you enjoy the podcast, we’d love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Law School Toolbox website. If you’re concerned about the bar exam, check out our sister site, the Bar Exam Toolbox. You can also sign up for our weekly podcast newsletter to make sure you never miss an episode!
Thanks for listening!
![]()

Looking for some help to do your best in law school? Find out about our law school tutoring options.

This episode was a great refresher on the often-overlooked nuances of contract remedies beyond expectation damages. I really appreciated the clear breakdown of incidental, reliance, and restitution damages—especially how the hypotheticals helped bring each concept to life. The practical examples made it easier to see how these doctrines play out in real-world scenarios. Perfect timing for exam prep—thanks for another helpful and engaging episode!