• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Law School Toolbox®

All the tools you need for law school success

  • Tutoring
  • Courses
    • Start Law School Right
  • Job Help
  • Law School 101
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • About

From Objective to Persuasive Writing, Part 1: Law

February 4, 2016 By Doretta McGinnis 2 Comments

legal writing

In most first-year legal writing courses, the spring semester signals an important shift from objective to persuasive writing. The classic curriculum introduces objective (or predictive) writing, in the form of an office memorandum, in the fall, then switches to persuasive writing, typically an appellate brief (less often, a trial brief) in the spring. Many students struggle with this transition, feeling as if they’ve barely mastered one approach before being asked to change gears. Here are some suggestions to reduce your struggle and improve your persuasiveness.

Rely on Similarities

Legal writing is a skill; it develops cumulatively over time. You’re not starting from scratch. Rather, you’re building on the skills you’ve already learned. The fundamentals of legal analysis remain the same. The Discussion section of a memo and the Argument section of a brief are similarly organized, with rule explanation followed by rule application/analysis. The difference is whether that analysis is expressed objectively or persuasively.

Be Mindful of Differences

You’ll understand the significance of the persuasive approach if you compare the audience and purpose of a memo with those of a brief. A memo is written to a supervising attorney. Its purpose is to assess all sides of an issue and, accordingly, to predict an outcome or recommend a course of action. A brief is written to a judge. Its purpose is to persuade the judge to rule in your client’s favor. How do you achieve that purpose?

Present the Law Persuasively

Draft Persuasive Headings

Every component of your brief is an opportunity to persuade, including headings. Neutral, topical headings were sufficient in a memo, but a brief requires complete, persuasively phrased sentences that convey the desired outcome and refer to determinative facts.

Emphasize the “Best” Cases

Choose precedent with a view toward persuasiveness, especially if your assignment involves open-ended research. You’re likely to find more cases than you need; take persuasive value into account when deciding which cases to use and how to use them. I’m not referring to persuasive authority; I mean recent, mandatory authority with factual and procedural similarities to your assignment. Your rule explanation should emphasize your best cases. You can always bolster your points by listing other cases in a string cite.

Write About the Law From Your Client’s Perspective

Last semester you probably did not dwell on how to phrase a rule in your memo. You may have quoted the rule or paraphrased it without considering whether it implicitly favored one party or another. You probably accepted it as objective. Now it’s time to frame the rules favorably for your client.

Suppose you found the following rule for adverse possession:

Adverse possession, in order to ripen into title, must be: (1) continuous, (2) hostile, (3) open and notorious, (4) actual, (5) exclusive.

Now presume you represent a plaintiff whose claim to quiet title under a theory of adverse possession was denied and who is now appealing this decision. How would you phrase the rule in your appellate brief? You’d want to phrase it favorably to your client’s interests. It might look like this:

A claimant must be granted title to land by adverse possession if her occupation of the land was continuous, hostile, open and notorious, actual and exclusive.

How would the defendant-appellee phrase the rule? Perhaps like this:

Title to land must not be granted under adverse possession unless the claimant proves by a preponderance of evidence each of the following elements: that her occupation was (1) continuous, (2) hostile, (3) open and notorious, (4) actual, and (5) exclusive.

Each rule statement suggests the desired outcome (title must – or must not – be granted) and makes the standard sound relatively easy or difficult to meet.

Make the Strongest Arguments

You don’t have to make every conceivable argument. It is more persuasive to focus on the strongest arguments and omit weaker arguments. This requires careful judgment. Assess all the arguments you might make and decide which are best supported by the law and facts. Keep in mind the burden of proof: the plaintiff has to prove all elements of her claim; failure to prove just one results in a loss for plaintiff and a victory for defendant. If you represent the defendant, this means you may argue selectively, prevailing on a single element plaintiff failed to prove.

Consider Whether to Treat Counterarguments

To assess an issue objectively, you have to consider counterarguments and explain them. When you’re writing a brief, however, you have more latitude. You may choose to address counterarguments that you’re sure your opponent will raise, in a way that disposes of them as weak and non-persuasive. Or, if you’ll have the opportunity to respond, you may make a strategic decision to wait and see what your opponent does first. Always be sure to present your arguments first, then dispose of counterarguments.

— – —

Want more law school tips? Sign up for our free mailing list today.

Other helpful Legal Writing posts:

  • Embrace The Difference of Legal Writing
  • 5 Tips for a Great Legal Writing Assignment
  • Dos and Don’ts for Using Sample Documents in Legal Writing
  • Podcast Episode 11: Legal Writing 101

Image Credit:  Jirsak / Shutterstock


 

Looking for some help to do your best in law school? Find out about our law school tutoring options.


About Doretta McGinnis

Doretta McGinnis is a law school tutor for Law School Toolbox. After graduating from Harvard, she worked in academic publishing until a friend dared her to go to law school. Doretta earned her JD at Penn Law, where she was an editor of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review and a legal writing instructor. Eager to pay off her student loans, she practiced labor and employment law at a major Philadelphia law firm, but soon left Biglaw to pursue her interest in legal education. Doretta joined the faculty at Widener University Delaware Law School, where, over the course of nearly 20 years, she served as Associate Director of the legal writing program and taught labor law, employment discrimination, and bar exam prep. She is the co-founder of Admission Logic, LLC, an independent educational consulting practice focused on college and law school admissions.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Pat

    03.14.21

    Do you have tutoring

    Reply
    • Elizabeth Greiner

      03.15.21

      We do. You can find the information here: https://lawschooltoolbox.com/tutoring-for-law-school-success/

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • Podcast
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

About Us

If you find law school tough, you are not alone! The Law School Toolbox team is here to help you through it. Check out our helpful free content, podcasts, courses and one-on-one tutoring. Thanks for stopping by and drop us a line if you have any questions. We also invite you to join our weekly mailing list, for advice right to your inbox.

Recent Posts

5 Ways a Law School Resume is Different from a College Resume

5 Ways a Law School Resume is Different from a College Resume

As the 1L summer job search gets into full swing, it’s time to make sure your resume is up to date and ready to send out to employers. If you’ve only … Read More about 5 Ways a Law School Resume is Different from a College Resume

Podcast Microphone

Podcast Episode 374: How to Be a Great Law Journal Member

Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! Today, we're talking about how to be a great law journal member, whether you're on Law Review or a … Read More about Podcast Episode 374: How to Be a Great Law Journal Member

Bluebook 101 - Tips on Efficiently Navigating The Bluebook

Bluebook 101 – Tips on Efficiently Navigating The Bluebook

There are podcasts and blog posts alike on the many nuances of The Bluebook. But first, what even is The Bluebook? Calling all 1Ls—this is your bare … Read More about Bluebook 101 – Tips on Efficiently Navigating The Bluebook

Podcast Microphone

Podcast Episode 373: Not Happy with Your First Semester Law School Grades? How to Do Better in the Second Semester (w/Nicola Rossi)

Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! Today, we're excited to have one of our tutors, Nicola Rossi, joining us to talk about how to improve … Read More about Podcast Episode 373: Not Happy with Your First Semester Law School Grades? How to Do Better in the Second Semester (w/Nicola Rossi)

Five Law School “Rules” I Broke My First Semester

Five Law School “Rules” I Broke My First Semester

There are certain maxims of how to do law school that seem to have been passed down from generations of students through the ages. It can be scary to … Read More about Five Law School “Rules” I Broke My First Semester

Want Better Law School Grades?

Sign Up for Our Exam Tips!

Footer

  • Podcast
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Job Help
  • About
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Refunds

Copyright 2023 Law School Toolbox®™